Support #323
set c/c++ compiler invocation to "-j2" to default?
Status: | Closed | Start date: | 2014-11-15 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | |||
Assignee: | - | % Done: | 50% | ||
Category: | Recipe | Spent time: | - | ||
Target version: | Toolkit 0.1 |
Description
We currently have 2 "executers" as the default in Jenkins so "make -j2" should be perfectly doable as most machines today have at least 4 threads available.
Shall we do this?
IMHO this would speed up the deployment process.
History
#1 Updated by Florian Lier almost 10 years ago
Does feedback mean it is implemented?
#2 Updated by Jan Moringen almost 10 years ago
Florian Lier wrote:
Does feedback mean it is implemented?
No.
If we decide to do this, it can mostly be achieved on the template level, I think. Most of the work will be designing good defaults, allowing the defaults to be overwritten and not making the solution CMake/make-specific.
@Johannes: I have never seen parallelization wihtin Jenkins jobs. Do you know whether this is a supported use-case?
#3 Updated by Johannes Wienke almost 10 years ago
This somehow contradicts the idea of jenkins executors.
#4 Updated by Robert Haschke almost 10 years ago
For me, it's not clear, why jenkins executors should be single-threaded.
If there is only a single job to execute, it will greatly benefit from parallelization. Otherwise, i.e. having multiple parallel jobs that in turn are parallelized, will not harm much, wouldn't it?
Hence, I vote for job-internal parallelization too.
#5 Updated by Johannes Wienke almost 10 years ago
Using jenkins parallelization + job parallel builds will easily flood the available working memory on the computer.
#6 Updated by Florian Lier almost 10 years ago
I have the feeling at some point this has been implemented in the famula branch, is that correct? I would, again, vote for
a -D j=int option with a comment "expert" mode.
Jenkins comes with #2 executers by default and most machines these days support at least 4 threats. I believe parallel C/C++ builds are more efficient than more executers. For example if a c/c++ job which has a lot of downstream dependencies (that are correctly blocked in this case) takes forever, parallel executers deliver no speed up.
So, if you know what you are doing, and you have 2 executers and let's say 8 threats available -j >2 won't hurt much.
#7 Updated by Robert Haschke almost 10 years ago
Yes, in the famula branch I added an appropriate variable make.threads for autotools and freestyle projects. However, I wasn't able to influence cmake builds in this manner.
Even having many executors AND many build threads typically doesn't harm - as long as enough memory is available.
#8 Updated by Florian Lier about 9 years ago
Did this feature make it into the master?
#9 Updated by Jan Moringen about 9 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
Jan Moringen)
Florian Lier wrote:
Did this feature make it into the master?
I don't know but this can be done entirely on the template level.
#10 Updated by Robert Haschke about 9 years ago
As far as I could see (when I was searching for an appropriate option),
this cannot be handled on the template level.
There is no make command specified in the templates for cmake:
grep -r [^c]make .
./toolkit/T600-freestyle.template: "make.command": "
./toolkit/T600-freestyle.template:make -j${make.threads|1}
./toolkit/T700-autotools.template:make -j${make.threads|1}
./ci/T600-freestyle.template: "make.command": "
./ci/T600-freestyle.template:make -j${make.threads|1}
./ci-deploy/T600-freestyle.template: "make.command": "
./ci-deploy/T600-freestyle.template:make -j${make.threads|1}
./ci-deploy/T700-autotools.template:make -j${make.threads|1}
./_common/T800-runnable.template: "make.command": "
./_common/T800-runnable.template:make -j${make.threads|1}
The corresponding jenkins commands are generated by the binary...
#11 Updated by Jan Moringen about 9 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to In Progress
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
build-generator master allows this. Not sure what good defaults are, though.
#12 Updated by Jan Moringen about 9 years ago
- Category changed from build-generator to Recipe
#13 Updated by Florian Lier over 7 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed